vexxarrcommunity Forum Index
  Register FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in 
Log in to check your private messages  ·  fChat
"V", the 21st century re-do version.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    vexxarrcommunity Forum Index -> Just talking
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bizzybody
Post-Apocalyptic


Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 161

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 3:35 am    Post subject: "V", the 21st century re-do version. Reply with quote

Yup, Hollywood is fresh out of new ideas. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_(2009_TV_series)[/url]

Pickup was announced in May, 2009 (apparently very quietly), post-pilot filming began August, 10, 2009.

The only reason I found this was I just watched all three VHS tapes of "V: The Final Battle" and then went to look it up on Wikipedia.

Crazy coincidence, "SyFy" was showing the original "V" miniseries Sunday at the same time I was watching the sequel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Yorick
No brian domage


Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 163
Location: Adks NY

PostPosted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've known about it for MONTHS.


so there.



this is actually because I was a really big fan of the show in the 80's (all the novels, all the comic books, copies on VHS and now DVD ... but I never did get the Visitor action figure). Hopefully less cheese this time around, but there darn well better be some distended jaws.

Plus, Inara from "Firefly" is Diana. (or whatever her character is being called this time around. The lead lizard.)

tho it's only on for a month, and then skips to MARCH. Grah.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ratzmandious
Taunt me not - I control your power bill


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 647
Location: My orbital habitat

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 2:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hate to say this... but there are even spoilers for it!
_________________
"I'm not hostile! I'm just aggressively interactive!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bizzybody
Post-Apocalyptic


Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 161

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Visitors come, pretend to be friends, suck up our resources, do the "To Serve Man" thing...

Eventually the humans triumph, or the dopes at ABC will cancel it when it doesn't instantly stomp NCIS into the ratings dirt. (As if that'll happen!)

I trust ABC about as much as I trust FOX to not screw things up with a good SF series.

On the ABC killed list, Battlestar Galactica and Space Rangers*
On the FOX killed list, Space: Above and Beyond and Sliders**
CBS gave Otherworld an early boot and NBC couldn't figure out what to do with Salvage 1.***

I'm sure there's plenty of other good series the network suits just wouldn't give enough of a chance, but can't think of them right now.

*A textbook example of How to Kill a Series. Ordered only six episodes then only broadcast four of them, with the first episode broadcast last. Guaranteed to be a fast method of killing ratings.

**Which got a second chance on SciFi, but they quickly bungled it with stupid writing. (Pulsars are *not* little rocky objects that fly through space!) I dunno how Cleavant Derricks managed to stick it out to the end.

***Based on the TV movie "Salvage" starring Andy Griffith as a salvage yard owner with a dream of building a rocket to salvage the "junk" left on the moon. The movie was good, the series was... variable quality. Once you've been to the moon, there's not a great lot one can do with a rocket that runs on monohydrazine super-fuel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Yorick
No brian domage


Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 163
Location: Adks NY

PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Otherworld deserved the early boot. Good concept but the production doesn't hold up to repeated viewing. When I saw it again as an adult I couldn't believe how awful it was.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bizzybody
Post-Apocalyptic


Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 161

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A little review of "V" Mark 2009.

The FX are all nice and shiny for the most part. The plot so far appears to be engaging and the characters well written and acted.

Two of the major roles have been gender-flipped. In place of the Mike Donovan TV cameraman protagonist we have Erica Evans, FBI agent.

Instead of a female spineless suck-up collaborating TV journalist we're given a male TV journalist who initially shows a bit of spine and scruples but is fading fast towards being a Visitor bootlicker.

Instead of Daniel Bernstein it looks like the new show will have Erica Evans' son become the 'brown shirt'.

Whats not so good.

The Visitors are shown to be more homogenized socially. There's no hint yet of a military structure as was immediately evident in the original. The Visitors have no apparent logo or symbol and nothing about their clothing has any indication of rank on the Visitors wearing uniforms. The Dianna replacement Anna takes the stage wearing what looks like fairly conventional human style skirt and jacket ensemble while her aide/spokesman is wearing a slightly unconventionally designed business suit.

The "reveal" comes wayyyy too soon. In episode one they've shown that the Visitors are actually reptilian, are running a terrorist operation, have infiltrated government and law enforcement agencies and have their own resistance movement fighting against their nasty plans for Earth, and we're introduced to many of the main characters in rapid-fire fashion. *whew!*

The original "V" was two long episodes so everything had to be squeezed into that amount of time. The new show is supposed to be a regular series with a multi-episode run where all this could've been spread out a bit.

The new Visitors just aren't alien enough. They don't need sunglasses outdoors and they sound exactly like humans. There's not a thing about their appearance that stands out and says "Uh, hello. We *just arrived* and would like to have a chat over a bowl of fresh mice... er... rice.".

If some aliens showed up tomorrow and there was nothing about them to make me a bit nervous about them, that would make me *a whole lot* suspicious about them.

Best line so far: "Our congregation consists of one heroin addict and Roy!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
vexxarr
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 723

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 3:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bizzybody wrote:
On the ABC killed list, Battlestar Galactica and Space Rangers*


Space Rangers killed Space Rangers.That show ranks about a half a tick above The Powers Of Matthew Starr...
_________________
World Conquest is easy… It’s conquering the inhabitants that gets sticky.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Ratzmandious
Taunt me not - I control your power bill


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 647
Location: My orbital habitat

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember I quite liked Space Rangers at the time it was on, and was most upset with the schedule and the cancellation.

Then I got to watch it again a few years later (when I was quite a bit older) on the British Sci-Fi channel. Embarassed

I really can't remember what I liked so much about it the first time around. It was trite, badly written, derivative - the list goes on.

Oh well, there was a good reason it was canned. But on the other hand you have to wonder about the people who actually approved the making of it in the first place.
_________________
"I'm not hostile! I'm just aggressively interactive!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Yorick
No brian domage


Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 163
Location: Adks NY

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ratzmandious wrote:
But on the other hand you have to wonder about the people who actually approved the making of it in the first place.

"Can we sell ads at Males 18-34 with this show? yes? do eeeiiittttt!!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ratzmandious
Taunt me not - I control your power bill


Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 647
Location: My orbital habitat

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm... I guess, that's right.

Hey... I'm almost out of that category (come next month), does that mean that I'll stop finding all of this television entertaining?!?

Oh wait...
_________________
"I'm not hostile! I'm just aggressively interactive!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
SpudGun
alio continuus orbis


Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Posts: 106
Location: UK

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 9:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Question:

Having somehow completely missed "V" the first time around (though I seem to remember watching an animated and seriously psychedelic film in my youth called "Super V" or some such) and with the new version, episode 1 now sat on my desktop waiting to be viewed...

Should I watch the original first? Or simply crack on with the new series?

Awaiting your response...
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
vexxarr
Site Admin


Joined: 10 Jan 2005
Posts: 723

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just watch the new series. Then go back and watch the original TV movie from the 80s. The original (which was not immediately picked up as a series) has a lot of nifty effects for its day but is packed to the brim with schlocky goodness. Bonus, Mark Singer, pre-fattectomy.
_________________
World Conquest is easy… It’s conquering the inhabitants that gets sticky.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
bizzybody
Post-Apocalyptic


Joined: 22 May 2008
Posts: 161

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 12:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The original is also full of big 80's hair. ;) Another difference I've noticed is most of the the women in the original aren't as scrawny as has become the fashion (again) in recent years.

The original's FX were really good for mid 1980's television, including genuine computer graphics - as computer graphics, not FX. There's also some smoke and lasers used in Diana's 'conversion chamber'. Oooo, lasers. ;) (Hmmm, "V: Remastered" with all the models redone with good CGI...)

It also used a vocoder to add a vibrato to the Visitors' voices when they were a bit stressed. When calm and collected the vocoder FX were used very little. Back then a vocoder was a large, rack mounted and expensive hunk of gear. Now there's an unsupported freeware (used to be a commercial app) 18 channel analog vocoder simulator called Cylonix. The default settings sound exactly like an original BSG Cylon.

The original has a "Whatever happened to?" actress. "V: The Final Battle" was Jenny Beck's first role, wherein she had a total of about 5 words to say. She went on to a role in the TV Western series "Paradise", the original "V" TV series and two B movies (all with plenty of lines), then nothing since.

She's dropped off the map as completely as did Maren Jensen who played "Athena" in the original Battlestar Galactica.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    vexxarrcommunity Forum Index -> Just talking All times are GMT - 5 Hours


Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum